nesquick
\m/
Banned
Legend
Karma: -3
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 3371
Richard Fortus, the phenomenon
|
|
« on: August 10, 2006, 10:07:39 AM » |
|
I'm 99,9999% sure that the real version of "Catcher in the Rye" is: 1) a little bit faster 2) played higher
The leaked version was not representative of what we will hear on the record. I've heard a re-done version with a faster tempo and a higher pitch and it sounds absolutely better. More natural. This is a fucking great track.
|
|
« Last Edit: August 10, 2006, 10:12:07 AM by nesquick »
|
Logged
|
Here today... waiting for Chinese Democracy
|
|
|
Neemo
|
|
« Reply #1 on: August 10, 2006, 10:10:26 AM » |
|
i think the slow plodding pace of the orig leak suits the song more...gives it a feeling of depression...so i think that the orig speed we heard is correct...
but who knows really untill we hear the final version
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
COMAMOTIVE
Legend
Karma: -3
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 1799
At least there's a reaction
|
|
« Reply #2 on: August 10, 2006, 10:18:39 AM » |
|
I find the one we have heard to be boring and missing something. Hopefully this change you're speaking of will add a little something
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
agropolus
Rocker
Karma: -1
Offline
Posts: 378
Here Today...
|
|
« Reply #3 on: August 10, 2006, 10:21:45 AM » |
|
where did you hear this re-done version?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Neemo
|
|
« Reply #4 on: August 10, 2006, 10:26:44 AM » |
|
IMO the change is minimal....like 6 seconds over the whole song...i think it was just a fan version of the track...condensing it to the point where Axl is on the brink of sounding like Mickey Mouse...the faster one is like only 98% faster than the orig one
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Miggy
Banned
Headliner
Karma: -1
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 107
|
|
« Reply #5 on: August 10, 2006, 10:34:15 AM » |
|
98? You must mean 2!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Neemo
|
|
« Reply #6 on: August 10, 2006, 10:35:50 AM » |
|
98?? ? ?You must mean 2!? ? doh!! yeah lol what he said
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Steel_Angel
Guest
|
|
« Reply #7 on: August 10, 2006, 10:38:19 AM » |
|
go to youtube, type in just "frozeninferno" and look 4 "imsorrys" version of citr. it sounds pretty sweet. he changed teh tempo too.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Evolution
Guest
|
|
« Reply #8 on: August 10, 2006, 10:40:35 AM » |
|
It sounds good. A little brighter than the original leak.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
nesquick
\m/
Banned
Legend
Karma: -3
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 3371
Richard Fortus, the phenomenon
|
|
« Reply #9 on: August 10, 2006, 10:43:32 AM » |
|
The version i heard was not the one of frozen inferno. Basically, a very few people heard it. It's higher and faster. Like Jungle demo 86 and Jungle on Appetite... do you see what I mean? There's a kind of "breakdown" (the song) feel to it. Not as fast though, but there is something like "breakdown" of UYI 2 in the pitch/speed. Mid-tempo. Not the slow tempo that was leaked. It just sounds more natural.
|
|
« Last Edit: August 10, 2006, 10:50:53 AM by nesquick »
|
Logged
|
Here today... waiting for Chinese Democracy
|
|
|
Steel_Angel
Guest
|
|
« Reply #10 on: August 10, 2006, 10:45:48 AM » |
|
weird. never heard that one. must sound crazy. does he sound like a chipmunk?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
duga
VIP
Karma: -1
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 1099
If you're not a rock star - at least act like one
|
|
« Reply #11 on: August 10, 2006, 10:51:02 AM » |
|
The version i heard was not the one of frozen inferno. Basically, a very few people heard it. It's higher and faster. Like Jungle demo 86 and Jungle on Appetite... do you see what I mean? There's a kind of "breakdown" feel to it. Not as fast though, but there is something like "breakdown" of UYI 2. Mid-tempo. Not the slow tempo that was leaked.
Jungle demo 86 sounds awful.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Stockholm 2006, Oslo 2010, Maryland 2016, Stockholm 2017, Gothenburg 2018
Power to the people, peace out and blame Canada
|
|
|
nesquick
\m/
Banned
Legend
Karma: -3
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 3371
Richard Fortus, the phenomenon
|
|
« Reply #12 on: August 10, 2006, 10:52:27 AM » |
|
weird. never heard that one. must sound crazy. does he sound like a chipmunk?
No, Axl sounds great.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Here today... waiting for Chinese Democracy
|
|
|
codenameninja
Banned
VIP
Karma: -3
Offline
Posts: 820
Here Today...
|
|
« Reply #13 on: August 10, 2006, 10:53:47 AM » |
|
I'm 99,9999% sure that the real version of "Catcher in the Rye" is: 1) a little bit faster 2) played higher
The leaked version was not representative of what we will hear on the record. I've heard a re-done version with a faster tempo and a higher pitch and it sounds absolutely better. More natural. This is a fucking great track.
So your not 100% sure and you think the song will bit played a little faster. Well thanks for your insight
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
nesquick
\m/
Banned
Legend
Karma: -3
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 3371
Richard Fortus, the phenomenon
|
|
« Reply #14 on: August 10, 2006, 10:56:29 AM » |
|
So frozen inferno, what do you think now??
|
|
|
Logged
|
Here today... waiting for Chinese Democracy
|
|
|
Steel_Angel
Guest
|
|
« Reply #15 on: August 10, 2006, 11:00:16 AM » |
|
its really good lol. soo you're pretty much right.
|
|
« Last Edit: August 10, 2006, 11:11:51 AM by frozen inferno »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
WARose
Boredom ate us like cancer
Legend
Karma: 0
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 3286
|
|
« Reply #16 on: August 10, 2006, 11:02:55 AM » |
|
i listened to his one as well a while ago.... i`m pretty sure it was fan made... well of course it`s fanmade
|
|
|
Logged
|
Psychologically, you could consider this a reunion tour because I`ve managed to find enough pieces of my mind in order to be with you here tonight - - Axl Rose, Chicago 2002
|
|
|
makane
|
|
« Reply #17 on: August 10, 2006, 11:11:19 AM » |
|
More natural? Did you even listen to the instrumental parts? I think this sounds very off-balanced. (the faster one)
|
|
|
Logged
|
YagetoutonyourownAndyoutakeallthatyouownAndyouforgetaboutyourhomeAndthenyou'rejustfuckin'gone!
|
|
|
nesquick
\m/
Banned
Legend
Karma: -3
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 3371
Richard Fortus, the phenomenon
|
|
« Reply #18 on: August 10, 2006, 11:14:34 AM » |
|
The "faster one" is the one I have wich you haven't listened to yet?
|
|
« Last Edit: August 10, 2006, 11:19:35 AM by nesquick »
|
Logged
|
Here today... waiting for Chinese Democracy
|
|
|
agropolus
Rocker
Karma: -1
Offline
Posts: 378
Here Today...
|
|
« Reply #19 on: August 10, 2006, 11:29:39 AM » |
|
where can I find this faster one?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
WARose
Boredom ate us like cancer
Legend
Karma: 0
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 3286
|
|
« Reply #20 on: August 10, 2006, 11:31:57 AM » |
|
you`re right nesquick. my version was even faster and sounded like shit.
but this doesn?t sound like the real deal either...we`ll never know what`s legit or not unfortunately. get the fuckin album out allready!!
|
|
|
Logged
|
Psychologically, you could consider this a reunion tour because I`ve managed to find enough pieces of my mind in order to be with you here tonight - - Axl Rose, Chicago 2002
|
|
|
DunkinDave
Banned
VIP
Karma: -4
Offline
Posts: 1407
Here Today...
|
|
« Reply #21 on: August 10, 2006, 11:38:55 AM » |
|
I'm 99,9999% sure that the real version of "Catcher in the Rye" is: 1) a little bit faster 2) played higher
The leaked version was not representative of what we will hear on the record. I've heard a re-done version with a faster tempo and a higher pitch and it sounds absolutely better. More natural. This is a fucking great track.
The demo was sourced from an audio cassette tape - what do you expect?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Steel_Angel
Guest
|
|
« Reply #22 on: August 10, 2006, 11:44:52 AM » |
|
theres another one imsorry remastered. sound cd qualitty ask me and i'll send.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
agropolus
Rocker
Karma: -1
Offline
Posts: 378
Here Today...
|
|
« Reply #23 on: August 10, 2006, 11:52:11 AM » |
|
nesquick, where can I find this version you are talking about? if you can, please pm me a link for it
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Neemo
|
|
« Reply #24 on: August 10, 2006, 11:55:17 AM » |
|
the one frozen inferno has i think is the correct one...imsorry is great at fixing audio files the slower version...5:38 long...the faster one i have heard is 5:31 is that the version you are talking about nesquick? the keyzremaster?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
agropolus
Rocker
Karma: -1
Offline
Posts: 378
Here Today...
|
|
« Reply #25 on: August 10, 2006, 11:58:35 AM » |
|
the one frozen inferno was talking about is very good, but I'm looking for this faster one, I'm pretty curious to know how it sounds
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
yorch
Headliner
Karma: 0
Offline
Posts: 59
Here Today...
|
|
« Reply #26 on: August 10, 2006, 12:03:17 PM » |
|
imsorry's remaster is awesome, i would love to hear the faster one too
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
yorch
Headliner
Karma: 0
Offline
Posts: 59
Here Today...
|
|
« Reply #27 on: August 10, 2006, 12:22:30 PM » |
|
i've heard the faster demo and it's the old one we all have, someone has just changed the tempo, it's only a little faster. it sounds more natural, that's true. i would love to hear an imsorry's remaster with this tempo.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Butch Français
|
|
« Reply #28 on: August 10, 2006, 12:23:50 PM » |
|
sounds decent. I guess the finished track will sound different than the demo we've heard. who knows how it will sound different, might be slightly faster cos it didn't sound bad at all!
|
|
|
Logged
|
of course there is no us and them, but them they do not think the same
|
|
|
nesquick
\m/
Banned
Legend
Karma: -3
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 3371
Richard Fortus, the phenomenon
|
|
« Reply #29 on: August 10, 2006, 12:24:13 PM » |
|
The pitch is higher also, not only the tempo. Try to listen to it for a couple of days, get used to it, after that you will never listen to the "slower" version again. The faster and higher version just sounds more natural.
|
|
« Last Edit: August 10, 2006, 12:26:09 PM by nesquick »
|
Logged
|
Here today... waiting for Chinese Democracy
|
|
|
Neemo
|
|
« Reply #30 on: August 10, 2006, 12:26:28 PM » |
|
the high part @ about 0:45 sounds a bit too messed up...too fast
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
yorch
Headliner
Karma: 0
Offline
Posts: 59
Here Today...
|
|
« Reply #31 on: August 10, 2006, 12:27:19 PM » |
|
The pitch is higher also, not only the tempo. Try to listen to it for a couple of days, after that you will never listen to the "slower" version again. The faster and higher version just sounds more natural. yeah, you're right.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Butch Français
|
|
« Reply #32 on: August 10, 2006, 12:28:23 PM » |
|
The pitch is higher also, not only the tempo. Try to listen to it for a couple of days, get used to it, after that you will never listen to the "slower" version again. The faster and higher version just sounds more natural. I barely listen to any of the demos anymore. I try not to wear them out before I hear a real version of them. with the exception of 'Better'...I just can't seem to stay away from that one for too long, I use it as my ringtone too
|
|
|
Logged
|
of course there is no us and them, but them they do not think the same
|
|
|
nesquick
\m/
Banned
Legend
Karma: -3
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 3371
Richard Fortus, the phenomenon
|
|
« Reply #33 on: August 10, 2006, 12:28:59 PM » |
|
Well no, this part doesn't sound too fast too me, it's just you get used with the slow version, but wait a couple of days and you'll the the faster one is more enjoyable/natural to listen to.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Here today... waiting for Chinese Democracy
|
|
|
AdZ
It's LiberAdZe, bitch!
HTGTH Crew
Legend
Karma: 3
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 5332
|
|
« Reply #34 on: August 10, 2006, 12:30:33 PM » |
|
This is just asking for trouble.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
nesquick
\m/
Banned
Legend
Karma: -3
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 3371
Richard Fortus, the phenomenon
|
|
« Reply #35 on: August 10, 2006, 12:31:16 PM » |
|
This is just asking for trouble.
PM
|
|
|
Logged
|
Here today... waiting for Chinese Democracy
|
|
|
user FKA webmoster
Rocker
Karma: 0
Offline
Posts: 194
Here Today...
|
|
« Reply #36 on: August 10, 2006, 01:29:23 PM » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ppbebe
|
|
« Reply #37 on: August 10, 2006, 01:29:52 PM » |
|
Maybe. maybe not. Isn't the leaked one supposed to be an early demo? In any case, the final cut will be different from that. By the way a week ago or so I heard the latest CITR in my dream. Previously I thought the song was although good, not really my cup but this new version changed my mind. It would hit the spot in the lingering heat of late summer if released, as a single or whatever.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Steel_Angel
Guest
|
|
« Reply #38 on: August 10, 2006, 01:48:31 PM » |
|
i also like chinese69illusions version. you know.. the one without the glitch.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
KillKurtzKids
Headliner
Karma: 0
Offline
Posts: 97
Here Today...
|
|
« Reply #39 on: August 10, 2006, 02:34:09 PM » |
|
The demo is at least 5 years old. The recording sounds damaged and cuts off too early. The song sounds pretty rough. The chorus is dodgy but it has a strong finish. Love the syth in the middle. The Na Na bits are great, but far too short. After the synth Na Na Na for two minutes, hit the final verse.. finish. No need for the chorus again. It has potential, sounds very much like a demo at the mo, lets see what 5 years have done to it.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Voodoochild
Natural Born Miller
Legend
Karma: 0
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 6305
Mostly impressive
|
|
« Reply #40 on: August 10, 2006, 04:48:43 PM » |
|
IMO, this thread sounds like when people complained and edited Better without the heavy middle...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
KillKurtzKids
Headliner
Karma: 0
Offline
Posts: 97
Here Today...
|
|
« Reply #41 on: August 10, 2006, 05:07:30 PM » |
|
You know your a nerd when your editing the demo's so you like them.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|