|
Title: Beautiful Disease vs. Dark Days Post by: acompleteunknown on July 17, 2008, 09:37:37 PM I just downloaded Dark Days...and have to say...I'm very impressed by it. I know many of the songs were on Beautiful Disease (or remixed versions).
Does anyone have both albums? How do they compare? Title: Re: Beautiful Disease vs. Dark Days Post by: donaltduck313 on July 18, 2008, 02:21:25 PM hi
I have both cds hm both are really good ones. And about songs: Superman I think is better on Dark Days, but Seatlehead for example, I think Beautiful Diseases version is better, even I like Dark Days?version much better than Neurotic Outsiders version... What you think about Loaded live album? Title: Re: Beautiful Disease vs. Dark Days Post by: alex420gnr on July 19, 2008, 08:54:44 AM Dark Days has the more polished versions of songs
Seattle Head is interesting - the Neurotic Outsiders version is my favorite because of its rawness No one has ever commented on the fact that the lyrics change for all 3 versions of SH - "now its 96 then 97 then 00 lets the listener know when each version was recorded IMO Beautiful Disease is far superior to Dark Days because it seems more personal for Duff The band that is currently together is definitly kick ass I met the whole band back in 2002 and they were all really cool and down to earth I wish hope they play some dates on the East Coast once their new album drops I much prefer Loaded to Velvet Revolver - definitly more of a classic rock with a punk twist band Rock on!! Title: Re: Beautiful Disease vs. Dark Days Post by: alejoyp on July 23, 2008, 03:52:43 PM Beatiful Disease... I don't know why, exactly... I feel that way
Title: Re: Beautiful Disease vs. Dark Days Post by: GeraldFord on July 23, 2008, 03:54:15 PM BD because Izzy's song rocks and Slash's solos are killer.
Would be nice if this CD would come out someday--better than Contraband, IMHO. |