Here Today... Gone To Hell! | Message Board


Guns N Roses
of all the message boards on the internet, this is one...

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
June 17, 2024, 07:16:36 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
1228071 Posts in 43258 Topics by 9264 Members
Latest Member: EllaGNR
* Home Help Calendar Go to HTGTH Login Register
+  Here Today... Gone To Hell!
|-+  Guns N' Roses
| |-+  Guns N' Roses
| | |-+  Do you actually think there is any merit to these rumours?
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]  All Go Down Print
Author Topic: Do you actually think there is any merit to these rumours?  (Read 10618 times)
Mr.Intensity
Banned
Legend
*****

Karma: -1
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2076


Intensity, Integrity, Intelligence


« Reply #40 on: April 10, 2006, 02:31:36 PM »

Do you actually think there is any merit to these Slash and Duff are back rumors?


...but then again, not one single person on this forum knows shit about what is happening with GNR, so who knows...

Tell that to Mr Intensity.

I guess most the stuff I post regarding Guns N Roses has been proven false then.. oh wait, everything I've said has been proven correct so far.. I forgot about that.
Logged
Mr.Intensity
Banned
Legend
*****

Karma: -1
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2076


Intensity, Integrity, Intelligence


« Reply #41 on: April 10, 2006, 03:01:26 PM »

The rumors in the Classic Rock article say that the supposed reunion tour fell apart when it was discovered that Axl demanded rights to the GNR name and the back catalog.? I can understand the back catalog issue, but hasn't it already been established that the band signed away the GNR name to Axl a long time ago?? That kind of poor attention to detail leads me to believe the article is BS.

The article was bs and I imagine it was confirmed by management to be BS which is why Jarmo removed it from this site.
Logged
WARose
Boredom ate us like cancer
Legend
*****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 3286



« Reply #42 on: April 10, 2006, 03:12:49 PM »

The rumors in the Classic Rock article say that the supposed reunion tour fell apart when it was discovered that Axl demanded rights to the GNR name and the back catalog.  I can understand the back catalog issue, but hasn't it already been established that the band signed away the GNR name to Axl a long time ago?  That kind of poor attention to detail leads me to believe the article is BS.

The article was bs and I imagine it was confirmed by management to be BS which is why Jarmo removed it from this site.

management said that there`d be no reunion. that`s what the article said as well....

and management tells what axl wants us and the public to know. they basically have to take and defend axl`s position. they?re not telling the gospel truth....  that`s something most people here seem to forget sometimes.....


do you seriously think some promoter would create a gnr logo???

and then send it to all other promoters as well as festival promoters?

and richard posts the unofficial logo as well?

i don?t think so....

I think Richard's webmaster would just scoop up the most recent guns n roses logo he could find, preferably the one being used on posters/pamphlets to promote the shows.

I also believe that any promoter, who was informed gnr would be on a concert, would probably at first try to get an "official" logo, but then if that could not be attained would resort to creating his own logo to promote the concert. Once that logo was seen, all other promoters would then assume its official or use it because it is the newest one to appear.

No source I have has verified that as "official"..and in my opinion it look pretty tacky.. that's not something I think Axl would approve of...



so basically you know nothing, but you speculate a little?

no offense, but i`d take christos` speculation regarding the logo over yours any day of the week....
« Last Edit: April 10, 2006, 03:15:55 PM by WARose » Logged

Psychologically, you could consider this a reunion tour because I`ve managed to find enough pieces of my mind in order to be with you here tonight - - Axl Rose, Chicago 2002
ppbebe
Legend
*****

Karma: -1
Offline Offline

Posts: 10203


« Reply #43 on: April 10, 2006, 03:33:44 PM »

Quote
The article also says there was an attempted mediation of the lawsuit - is that untrue as well?

Isn't the Classic Rock article supposed to be another April fool?

As for the attempted mediation bit, most likely their guess is as good as yours.
Logged
leesixxrose
Banned
VIP
****

Karma: -3
Offline Offline

Posts: 1228


I love Kiki


« Reply #44 on: April 10, 2006, 04:41:14 PM »

that logo is official dudes....

LOL... no its not dudes... some fan with photo shop and a little time made that... its not an offical logo.. you can look at it and tell.
Logged
Mr.Intensity
Banned
Legend
*****

Karma: -1
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2076


Intensity, Integrity, Intelligence


« Reply #45 on: April 10, 2006, 05:11:27 PM »

I'm publicly backing off the statement that logo wasn't created by someone in the gnr camp.  peace

My apologies WaRose.
Logged
leesixxrose
Banned
VIP
****

Karma: -3
Offline Offline

Posts: 1228


I love Kiki


« Reply #46 on: April 10, 2006, 05:13:54 PM »

I'm publicly backing off the statement that logo wasn't created by someone in the gnr camp.? peace

Why? what made u change your mind?
Logged
Mr.Intensity
Banned
Legend
*****

Karma: -1
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2076


Intensity, Integrity, Intelligence


« Reply #47 on: April 10, 2006, 05:22:08 PM »

I'm publicly backing off the statement that logo wasn't created by someone in the gnr camp.? peace

Why? what made u change your mind?

I finally got annoyed with all the logo talk and contacted buckethead's hand puppet, he then explained to me the truth. I also asked him for the track "prostitute" but the fucker wanted like 500 dolls/toys in trade...
Logged
leesixxrose
Banned
VIP
****

Karma: -3
Offline Offline

Posts: 1228


I love Kiki


« Reply #48 on: April 10, 2006, 05:28:17 PM »

I'm publicly backing off the statement that logo wasn't created by someone in the gnr camp.? peace

Why? what made u change your mind?

I finally got annoyed with all the logo talk and contacted buckethead's hand puppet, he then explained to me the truth. I also asked him for the track "prostitute" but the fucker wanted like 500 dolls/toys in trade...

what a greedy bastard!!!! 
Logged
TrixAreForKids
Silly Rabbit
Rocker
***

Karma: -1
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 471


Tongue like a razor.


« Reply #49 on: April 10, 2006, 05:39:45 PM »

The rumors in the Classic Rock article say that the supposed reunion tour fell apart when it was discovered that Axl demanded rights to the GNR name and the back catalog.? I can understand the back catalog issue, but hasn't it already been established that the band signed away the GNR name to Axl a long time ago?? That kind of poor attention to detail leads me to believe the article is BS.

The article was bs and I imagine it was confirmed by management to be BS which is why Jarmo removed it from this site.

As far as management is concerned, GnR's management is the worst.

Do you think management would confirm that article as true? The article implies that Axl tried to trick his former bandmates into signing over the whole back catalog.
Logged
leesixxrose
Banned
VIP
****

Karma: -3
Offline Offline

Posts: 1228


I love Kiki


« Reply #50 on: April 10, 2006, 05:44:00 PM »

As far as management is concerned, GnR's management is the worst.
Actually they prolly do a fine job... all the lawsuits, demands, Clear Channel, Overseas tours, Record label complaining, and nosy fans would prolly make them very very busy...... just be glad they dont have someone like Doc McGee who would sell GnR out in heartbeat.

Do you think management would confirm that article as true? The article implies that Axl tried to trick his former bandmates into signing over the whole back catalog.

Its so silly of an article and dumb.
Logged
guns_n_roses
Headliner
**

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 55


Here Today...


« Reply #51 on: April 10, 2006, 05:56:15 PM »

No, I think that if it had happened there'd more rumors about it.


The lawsuit is still going on, how could that be the case if those two were in the same band as Axl?? confused



/jarmo

But then all these tours with no lead guitarist... the songs we hear all have 3 guitars mixed into them. there is not doubt about that. and the lawsuit can go on or months up until axl comes out with the truth.

think about it why would axl say out of nowhere "oh, i was joking we are getting back together." now axl can say this. the day of the act, axl can say these lawsuits were all bullshit. and slash didnt drop the suit so it wouldnt look obvious. kind of my wide eyed vison of reality...sorry im sitll rootin' for old gnr. new gnr rules but im not living in 2006... see right now im in the year of april 91 and im bithcing at axl to bring out this new cd's.. and it seems so close yet so far.
Logged

"Sweetness is a virtue
And you lost your virtue long ago
You know I'd like to hurt you
But my conscience always tells me no"
ppbebe
Legend
*****

Karma: -1
Offline Offline

Posts: 10203


« Reply #52 on: April 10, 2006, 06:28:13 PM »

I can't follow the logic.

Do you actually think there would be any merit for GNR in making you believe that no ex member would come back if any?  And in suing each other just for that? To Lie to the fans to worry them till the last moment and then to surprise them that way would be pointless and plain silly. Or else, was such bs cool or something in the 80s? Huh

How about a piece of news?

Pharrell Collaborating With Velvet Revolver

"Despite rumors that Velvet Revolver members Slash and Duff McKagan will rejoin Guns N' Roses for a summer tour, the group is actually at work on its sophomore RCA album with an unlikely collaborator: uber hip-hop producer Pharrell Williams."- billboard news April 04, 2006
Logged
Sparksry
VIP
****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 893


Keep Calm and Welcome to the Jungle


« Reply #53 on: April 10, 2006, 07:07:50 PM »

I personally dont want a reunion .... u know what would have to happen.... thy would have to do the CD again with duff and slash so thats why im not really into the idea...  Undecided
Logged

So, is there any tread left on the tires? Or at this point would it be like throwing a hot dog down a hallway?
    - Stewie Griffin-
nonlinear
VIP
****

Karma: -1
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1149



« Reply #54 on: April 10, 2006, 07:36:09 PM »

Oh, something I relised.
Slash owns the rights to the 2 pistols wrapped in Roses logo right?
Well seeing how it's in the new logo... Cheesy I'm getting more and more suspisous.

NO, slash doesn't own the rights to it (why the fuck do people keep saying that/?Huh)

his father drew it, but axl owns it
Logged

"This isn't McDonald's or Burger King - it isn't 'Have it your way.'"
- Axl Rose, as cited by Del James
nonlinear
VIP
****

Karma: -1
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1149



« Reply #55 on: April 10, 2006, 07:40:24 PM »

that logo is official dudes....

That logo IS NOT official, it's all off center and shit.  there is NO WAY it would have flaws in it
Logged

"This isn't McDonald's or Burger King - it isn't 'Have it your way.'"
- Axl Rose, as cited by Del James
nonlinear
VIP
****

Karma: -1
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1149



« Reply #56 on: April 10, 2006, 07:43:09 PM »

For the last time.. that logo is NOT official.

It's promoter made and it wasn't made from the Gnr camp.

That's all.

give the source dude!

HE doens't have a source, it's just his opinion (like always) although I of course agree with him (like always) since he seems to be more level headed than most people on this board.  but he has no inside source
Logged

"This isn't McDonald's or Burger King - it isn't 'Have it your way.'"
- Axl Rose, as cited by Del James
Krispy Kreme
Guest
« Reply #57 on: April 10, 2006, 08:18:44 PM »

No.
Logged
Mr.Intensity
Banned
Legend
*****

Karma: -1
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2076


Intensity, Integrity, Intelligence


« Reply #58 on: April 10, 2006, 08:20:49 PM »

For the last time.. that logo is NOT official.

It's promoter made and it wasn't made from the Gnr camp.

That's all.

give the source dude!

HE doens't have a source, it's just his opinion (like always) although I of course agree with him (like always) since he seems to be more level headed than most people on this board.  but he has no inside source

Actually, I admitted I was wrong, that logo was created by someone in the gnr camp. ok
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]  All Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.057 seconds with 19 queries.