QuietUs Review?600 views, 40 replies, gone?Moved?

[RancidPunx]

Can I ask where this went?It was a very detailed track by track review.It was not a 2 line hack job like the Guardian. Was it moved?

[CheapJon]

if u can't find it anywhere, do u really don't understand where it went?

[norway]

He is not gonna listen, I'd just give it up.

[cotis]

It was a review about the CD as the writer saw fit. Are only positive reviews going to be allowed? I'd like to be able to read all reviews of the album before I buy it next week, good or bad.

[Jim]

Given past events, I can't imagine that anybody associated with the band is going to be too willing to give any publicity to, err, them.... Positive or not.

[RancidPunx]

Given past events, I can't imagine that anybody associated with the band is going to be too willing to give any publicity to, err, them.... Positive or not.

Sorry,it was QuietUs not Aniquiet.

[Grouse]

Haven't read that one yet but I'm sure it contained some negativity and as we all know that isn't allowed around here, since we're all such a positive bunch 

[Jim Bob]

Haven't read that one yet but I'm sure it contained some negativity and as we all know that isn't allowed around here, since we're all such a positive bunch 

imagine that.. fans being generally *gulp* positive 

[CaughtMeInaComa]

It was a review about the CD as the writer saw fit. Are only positive reviews going to be allowed? I'd like to be able to read all reviews of the album before I buy it next week, good or bad.

That's how it seems around here. If it ain't positive, don't bother....it will just be deleted.

[SLCPUNK]

Can I ask where this went?It was a very detailed track by track review.It was not a 2 line hack job like the Guardian. Was it moved?

I did a two second search on the interwebtubes and found it......crazy I know.

[cotis]

Sucks that we can't get the 'real news' which would be every story, bias or not, good or bad, against or for.

Any response for this, administrative members of the thread?

[D]

I dont mind any review as long as it seems genuine and honest. Thinking that 100 percent of everyone will love this album is just unrealistic.

So I dont mind negative reviews if it seems like they gave it a fair chance and they didn't like it.

Any review that focuses on the time spent making it, the old band, Jon Bon Jovi, whatever, I am not interested in wasting time reading and I dont feel those should be posted.

[RancidPunx]

I dont mind any review as long as it seems genuine and honest. Thinking that 100 percent of everyone will love this album is just unrealistic.

So I dont mind negative reviews if it seems like they gave it a fair chance and they didn't like it.

Any review that focuses on the time spent making it, the old band, Jon Bon Jovi, whatever, I am not interested in wasting time reading and I dont feel those should be posted.

So,people shouldn't be allowed to decide for themselves about album reviews? Sounds cool,if you like the idea of ChiDem being banned in China and all.Let's not let those people decide for themselves either

Also, this review was very detailed, it was track by track.The guy who wrote it was heavily into the Illusions, so he was very familiar with GNR.Again,this is a job for reviewers, they don't have the time to give CD repeated listens.

[RancidPunx]

Can I ask where this went?It was a very detailed track by track review.It was not a 2 line hack job like the Guardian. Was it moved?

I did a two second search on the interwebtubes and found it......crazy I know.

Your point is?Of course anyone can find it using a search for Quietus and GNR.The point is, I was asking why it was removed/moved after it had generated a discussion on here.