Here Today... Gone To Hell!

IT' MILKING TIME! Even tho they're trying to get every last dollar they can out of this franchise, I'm still kinda cursious as to what'll happen in this one. How bout you?

(http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a54/Pbryant81/Other%204/saw4post.jpg)


http://www.aintitcool.com/node/32283

http://www.joblo.com/saw-45-news

wow :drool: :puke:

SAW III was awsome i love how saw has a story line instead of just 2 hours of a bucher going at some poor bastard in the chair (hostles good to but it gets old)

when it come out?

well supposedly its not a prequel soo i dont understand how this is possible. Jigsaw is dead...


the first two were awesome, and i thought Saw 3 was decent.

Well the official story is that Jeff must now "play a game" to save his daughter, one presumably consisting of all kinds of nasty bits.

What I'm curious about is that the director has said that there are scenes in the 3rd one which don't make a whole lot of sense by themselves but that link in heavily with scenes for this one. Has definite potential.

well thats interesting. i thought the third one was solid, but it felt a bit forced to me. like they tried too hard to top the second one (which they didnt in my opinion).

Release date:

Saw - October 29
Saw 2 - October 28
Saw 3 - October 27
Saw 4 - October 26

yup they've been churning them out once a year since 2004. i saw the first two in theatres.

i'll never forget that chick having to jump in the giant vat of used hypodermic needles. i fucking flipped out when i saw that on the big screen.

"Everyone's thinking, 'Oh, they're doing a prequel,' but we're not. Is Tobin back? One hundred percent he is. Is he badass in this? One hundred percent he is. Is Tobin only in flashbacks? No, he's not. Is Tobin dead? Yes he is. Is Tobin a ghost? No, he's not." - Director Darren Bousman

- Fucking Bizarre!

This is pretty exciting news.  I just read on IMDB about Saw 4 and it looks like Jigsaw will be back in the form of video tapes he left behind for Jeff who now has to save his daughter.  Should be cool...the first Saw was a complete mind fuck when they pulled everything together at the end...it should be interesting how they do it again.

ok, now this is milkage.

The director/writer/producer (leigh? someone) was on ABC television in the early 90s.
 
He was the film critic for a Saturday morning show "Recovery". Live bands + other good funny cool 'out there' stuff. I can't describe it any other way as I was usually 'recovering'........ Almost the best thing to wake up to (or come home to) after hitting the dance floor Friday night (I 'remember' dancing to a lot of Kylie tunes.......)  ;D

I also 'remember' waking up one morning to find Silverchair rockin' out the ABC studio!

We always knew that Leigh would go far!  : ok:

He didn't go far enough. I'm starting a fund, if we all throw in $5 we can book him on one of those private space flights. Not sure we'll have enough for the round-trip ticket though, sucks.

The first SAW was okay for what it was. The following two were pretty awful, I thought. Boy is my thumb not on the pulse of. . . living. . . people. 

Oh........ I've only seen Saw 1.
Or was that just called Saw?

Video/audio tapes and pre-designed trappings, anyone?

haven't seen any of them, they any good?

clone? a twin brother

well that depends:

do u like horror films?

If u do, then you wont like Saw

do u like wooden acting and zero plot?

Saw could be for you then....

I loved the way a surgeon couldnt work out the guy a meter away from him wasnt dead - ya'd think the absence of rigour mortis, the colour of the skin, the fact the body was frakking breathing (!) would all give it away - but nope.

oh come on you're just mad they got ya in the end? :hihi:

He had no idea how long the body had been there, the muscle relaxers minimized his breathing... Plus that wasnt his first concern...

On the Subject of Saw IV, the tape he coverd in wax in saw III, has been bothering me since I first saw it.. Hopefully we'll find out what that was...

They're decent mindfuck popcorn flicks.....not the best of modern horror cinema by any means, but passable movies.  The best part about them, really, is the creative "traps" and ways they kill people.  They're not much in the way of real scares....going with the more modern "gross out" horror (and even then, the gore isn't all that spectacular).  But the toys are interesting feats of engineering....and the standard "mindfuck" ending is always interesting to try to figure out.

They're certainly not high brow cinema (and no one should really expect them to be) but for Halloween fun, they make a nice date night or whatever.

at least they have an interesting premise. Hostel is basicallly?just people getting tortured for two hours.

i like the whole concept of Jigsaw being close to dying, and punishing people who don't value life, like drug addicts etc. and making them "play a game" to live. i always found that really cool and thought provoking.?

although i will admit the acting in the first one wasnt good, the rest of them had decent acting, especially for horror movie standards.

I think I'll save my money for Hostel Part III ;)

well if you like the orgional SAW and SAW2  you should check out Cube.... and the other 2 or 3 in the series. some common writers and direction and producers etc.... IMO this is really where SAW came from as an idea.

throw 5 or more random stranger in a big box, and let them try and escape knowing nothing about the structure or why they are there.... random traps in rooms.... people getting burnt alive, gassed with neuro toxin injected with dieseases, going insane and killing each other, .... lol...... i need to dl em all again and watch em.. lol

Cube kicks Saw's ass. Even the sequels do, actually.

Can't say I am interested. The first one was  gross  enough. And now part 4? Really, it  is just a  pure  play for money, nothing else.

i thought Saw was good, i was kinda disappointed with Saw II, and i thought SAW III was terrible.

still, the basic premise is interesting so i'll definitely check this out.

How can you say that if you've never seen the 2nd or 3rd?? Its not like Haloween 3 or anything...

Each movie is made with a sequel in mind...

Thats what ALL movies are. Not just sequals.

actually,

when he pulled the recorder from jigsaw's hand my first thought was 'wouldnt rigour mortis have caused the hand to freeze up making it damn near impossible to move the recorder?' (ya see how intently i watch films :P)

It did occur to me then that this guy might just be alive but i dismissed it believing the film was far too stupid to pull something like that - after all the surgeon would have sene a guy breathing..right? Right??


he was lying on his front - which means the body had to physically rise and fall as he breathed, doesnt matter how hard he was trying to hold his breath. It might not have been their first concern but the colour of the skin would have given it away instantly - dead people arent a fleshy pink colour!

Also jigsaw was ''dead'' from a self inflicted gunshot wound - but there was no exit wound!

He had a revolver nearby, at close range there would be a gaping hole somewhere! He had his face paint on but there was still no exit wound at the back - a surgeon would notice this stuff, hell i did and my medical knowledge is hardly PhD level


i'll assume it will be some clever twist like 'Jigsaw, i am your father!'

hypercube... was by far my fav..... hehehe... though ube zero was not half bad either

You people are so cynical!

yeah well....arnold is the running man!  :hihi:

first official picture:

(http://media.movieweb.com/galleries/4599/2807/lo/Saw4stil.jpg)

high resolution: http://media.movieweb.com/galleries/4599/2807/hi/Saw4stil.jpg

Jigsaw's wearing stilletto's?! - holy crap they werent lying about the twist!

And I didn't know the killer would be a Pink Floyd fan - just look at the pig's head!

(http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a54/Pbryant81/Other%204/saw4poster1big.jpg)

More than likely a fake - That's Jigsaw's head! But still fucking kickarse!

It has to be fake because the "saw4.com" given at the bottom leads to a Lions Gate page where it shows it's new movies.
http://i58.photobucket.com/albums/g274/Chicky_Licky/k.png

http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=22826

Coming after Clive Barker and the panel for Midnight Meat Train might have been a tough to follow but director Darren Lynn Bousman and producer Mark Burg were up for it, having their first Lionsgate presentation in Hall H at Comic-Con International after years of doing the smaller rooms at the San Diego Convention Center. Their first announcement was that the MPAA had just given their first cut of Saw IV an NC-17 rating, and they would have to figure out what to do to, either to get it down to an R rating or decide whether to release it with that rating. They also had some problems with their planned Comic-Con clip, as they originally wanted to show the first five minutes of the movie but it was turned down, because it was "just too much" so they had to go with something else.

After a montage of clips from the first three "Saw" flicks, the crowd was treated to the famous line "Do you wanna play a game?" from Tobin Bell, who came out to join them and field a few questions from the audience.

Finally, they got to the clip, which similar to past years, featured one of the many deathtraps from the movie. It opened on an older bald man waking up on the floor of a room with a locked collar attached to a chain around his neck. He starts freaking out when he realizes that his eyes have been sewn shut and he can't see. He starts pulling on the chain to try to release himself and the camera follows the chain to another side where there's another guy (played by Justin Louis) and he has his mouth sewn shut. So the premise is that one guy can't see what's going on, and the other one can see but can't say anything. In between the two of them is a machine with gears that starts yanking on their chains pulling them closer to it and tightening the collar around their necks, and both of them start panicking. The blind man finds weapons (an axe and a sharp hook-like device) and he starts throwing them although he doesn't know what is pulling on him. The guys pull back and forth on the chain each one getting closer to the machine, though the lack of communication makes it impossible for them to work together on solving the puzzle. The younger guy spots a key on the back of the other man's neck and realizing that it might open the locked collar around his neck, he starts making his way over. The two men start fighting and the blinded man swings wildly with the hook and catches the mute man in the leg, blood starts spurting, and then the guy pulls the hook out of his leg and starts hacking the blind man with the axe over and over (or it might have been the hook--honestly, there was so much back and forth as they fought that it was hard to keep track). Finally, the mute man gets the key off the neck of his felled opponent and fumbles to try to open the lock on his neck but the chain pulls him closer to the machine and blood starts pouring out of his mouth because he's run out of time.

 :drool:


Ok I'm done reading spoilers from here on in... But this will make for a kick ass dvd full of extras!!

http://my.break.com/media/view.aspx?ContentID=364606

Looks pretty good to me ... At least they still are able to come up with some original ideas.

i don't think its jigsaw, its his young lady friend.  I think.  I hope.

So is that "offical" or fan made?

looks real to me  ???