nah not really has nothing to do with talent...even his hulking up was stupid and predictable....didn't make his champ run impressive to me
austin however, he had a cool move and an exciting title stint to watch
hogan was also in an era where titles reigns tended to last longer as a whole.
Its this simple.
Hogan made wwe what it is
But Austin saved it from what it could have become and people like bret and all the others in between could be as great a champion as they were but because of the time and place thats why i think Austin / Hogan are the top two. Closely followed by Bret