Here Today... Gone To Hell! | Message Board


Guns N Roses
of all the message boards on the internet, this is one...

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 17, 2024, 04:22:59 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
1227907 Posts in 43252 Topics by 9264 Members
Latest Member: EllaGNR
* Home Help Calendar Go to HTGTH Login Register
+  Here Today... Gone To Hell!
|-+  Guns N' Roses
| |-+  Dead Horse
| | |-+  Did the clean tone voice suit some songs better?		 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Did the clean tone voice suit some songs better?  (Read 3092 times)
CAFC Nick
VIP
****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1390


I don't know just what I should do...
« on: February 10, 2007, 10:48:28 AM »
I was just thinking about it, listening to Rock in Rio III...

Does the clean-tone voice suit some of the songs better?

I think it does...

I think Madagascar and The Blues are perfect example of where the clean-tone voice suits the song better. The older songs are more suited to his raspy voice but I think these two songs are definitely better with the clean-tone.

What do you think?
Logged
Robman?
Legend
*****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2507


Catcher In The Rye
« Reply #1 on: February 10, 2007, 12:10:23 PM »
Yeah, I can see where some people are coming from when they say they like his voice on maddy and the blues in '01-02. His clean voice certainly suited those songs. I don't see why he couldn't put on the clean voice to sing it, but the clean voice may have been due to bad vocal habits.

I think both song sounds good now though and Axl still does an amazing job.
Logged
EFISH
Guest
« Reply #2 on: February 10, 2007, 12:10:59 PM »
Deffinetly Madagascar.
Logged
jimb0
VIP
****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 1233

Here Today...
« Reply #3 on: February 10, 2007, 01:36:02 PM »
If I had never of heard it, I wouldn't have thought so, but kinda.

SHHHHH WE DON'T NEED HIM TO READ THIS AND RE-RECORD TO FURTHER PUSH BACK CD.
Logged
Dr_Sweden
Headliner
**

Karma: -1
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 98

Here Today...
« Reply #4 on: February 11, 2007, 01:52:47 PM »
NO...

the "clean" 01/02 voice sucked big time ... now hes back with POWER in his voice. ... ...
Logged
vietnow138
Rocker
***

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 387


Here Today...
« Reply #5 on: February 12, 2007, 04:44:16 PM »
I think it did for a few of the songs like Madagascar and The Blues, but other than that I think it actually butchered some of the songs such as nighttrain.
Logged
CAFC Nick
VIP
****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1390


I don't know just what I should do...
« Reply #6 on: February 17, 2007, 12:29:15 PM »
Quote from: vietnow138 on February 12, 2007, 04:44:16 PM
I think it did for a few of the songs like Madagascar and The Blues, but other than that I think it actually butchered some of the songs such as nighttrain.

So true. I think that song needs the raw power to the vocals.

Although, Axl's shout was more powerful in '02 on Madagascar than it is now IMO.
Logged
misterID
"Enlightened"
Banned
Legend
*****

Karma: -1
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2747


I did not have sexual relations with that llama
« Reply #7 on: February 17, 2007, 02:19:25 PM »
His 02 voice was pretty bad... I think mainly because he really didn't want to be singing at that point and he was just going through the motions... But the 01 voice was really fucking good.
Logged
GNR delusion disorder, there is help for you.
http://www.chopaway.com/evolution/forum.php
novemberparadise23
VIP
****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 617

Here Today...
« Reply #8 on: February 17, 2007, 02:48:38 PM »
the 02 voice wasnt horrible in my opinion but in no way was it better than his voice now 06 voice kicks ass  peace
Logged
"life sucks, but in a really beautiful kind of way."
Chris Axl
All that I wanted was...
Rocker
***

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 163


Axl Got My Sunglasses
« Reply #9 on: February 17, 2007, 02:49:52 PM »
Quote from: misterID on February 17, 2007, 02:19:25 PM
His 02 voice was pretty bad... I think mainly because he really didn't want to be singing at that point and he was just going through the motions... But the 01 voice was really fucking good.

How can you say that hes voice in 02' was really bad, when hes vocie in 01' was fucking good??


Myself, I like hes 01'/02' voice, but I like hes 06' alot more
Logged
If I were you, I'd manage to abhor the invitation
Of promised love that can't keep up with your adoration
Just use your head, and in the end you'll find your inspiration
To choose your steps and w
misterID
"Enlightened"
Banned
Legend
*****

Karma: -1
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2747


I did not have sexual relations with that llama
« Reply #10 on: February 17, 2007, 07:43:24 PM »
Because his 01 voice sounded better than his 02 voice?
Logged
GNR delusion disorder, there is help for you.
http://www.chopaway.com/evolution/forum.php
Irish gunner II
Rocker
***

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 477


IRISH BY BIRTH, CORK BY THE GRACE OF GOD
« Reply #11 on: February 17, 2007, 07:56:28 PM »
IMO the 2002 voice wasnt bad it was just so so different from what we as fans are used to hearing.
Logged
Chris Axl
All that I wanted was...
Rocker
***

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 163


Axl Got My Sunglasses
« Reply #12 on: February 18, 2007, 05:34:48 PM »
Quote from: misterID on February 17, 2007, 07:43:24 PM
Because his 01 voice sounded better than his 02 voice?
Their almoust the same dude.....
Logged
If I were you, I'd manage to abhor the invitation
Of promised love that can't keep up with your adoration
Just use your head, and in the end you'll find your inspiration
To choose your steps and w
EFISH
Guest
« Reply #13 on: February 18, 2007, 06:26:21 PM »
Actually, there was a pretty signifigant difference between 01 and 02. 01 was still that clean tone but he actaully kept it cool, in '02 it was just all over the place, a big mess.
Logged
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.032 seconds with 18 queries.