Ok. This is my last reply too so lets end this.
You actually tell me that you revealed this exclusive info you had on me just cause I called you names? I mean come on. Honestly. You just tried to grab on anything that could support your comment on me being not responsible.
And there we go:
any sane person who knew that wouldn't give you an email like this.
Sane person? To ME? See? You?re doing this once more. Trying to support your own statement with a sentence as if what you?re actually saying is true or real.
noone talked like that about me
Noone denies your work for GNR. But tell me, of all the things I have heard about you , your personality from people from your board, would I actually bother to believe those? Would I simply agree and believe when people tell me you are arrogant and rude? Did I ever show you anything like that?
Wouldn?t I have to look a little deeper on those? See why people would come up with something like this? Would?nt you actually have to find out why would anyone say I ?busted balls? if anyone did?
Would I simply believe anything and not verify that with the opinion of the other side? Well in you?re case , you didn?t?have to, since it would cool to use that as a strong statement, to support your view of me being not responsible and anyone INSANE to trust me.
And who ever told you I wanted the email myself? As I explained tons of times before, I only wanted to give it a shot and have an email sent to any of the ?official? people, not Merck specifically (I didn?t even know who that was till someone from your board told me). Such an email would be useless to me in future times, thus I would not need to have it myself.
So sane or insane, let us both of us ask each other about issues we got ?stored?and not bring those up, bonding together little pieces of useless information, trying to build up a general profile of someone we actually don?t know. And trust me, I have nothing to apologise for, apart from those animalistic words I used. All others were clearly explained. Take care