|
Title: Review of Slash's Sig Les Paul in Guitarist mag Post by: GypsySoul on September 21, 2004, 10:08:04 PM (http://gypsysoul.lunarpages.com/guitarist904.jpg)
(http://gypsysoul.lunarpages.com/guitarist904a.jpg) Title: Re: Review of Slash's Sig Les Paul in Guitarist mag Post by: GypsySoul on September 21, 2004, 10:13:16 PM (http://gypsysoul.lunarpages.com/guitarist904b.jpg)
Jimmy's hand-aged and Slash's 'Custom Authentic' aged headstocks.? Spot the difference (http://gypsysoul.lunarpages.com/guitarist904c.jpg) The Slash model's piezo bridge is something we'd like to see on more LPs (http://gypsysoul.lunarpages.com/guitarist904d.jpg) (http://gypsysoul.lunarpages.com/guitarist904e.jpg) Title: Re: Review of Slash's Sig Les Paul in Guitarist mag Post by: AdZ on September 23, 2004, 02:34:39 PM Thanks gypsy! That was great
Title: Re: Review of Slash's Sig Les Paul in Guitarist mag Post by: Voodoochild on September 24, 2004, 09:53:44 PM Thanks gypsy! Great read. I posted the translate here (http://www.gnrforum.brlogic.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=2948#2948), if you wanna check this out. Thank you again!? :-*
Title: Re: Review of Slash's Sig Les Paul in Guitarist mag Post by: Oddy on September 24, 2004, 11:02:05 PM hey gypsy i don't suppose you could post the justin hawkins one too?
Title: Re: Review of Slash's Sig Les Paul in Guitarist mag Post by: GypsySoul on September 25, 2004, 01:44:25 PM (http://gypsysoul.lunarpages.com/guitarist904f.jpg)
(http://gypsysoul.lunarpages.com/guitarist904g.jpg) (http://gypsysoul.lunarpages.com/guitarist904h.jpg) Title: Re: Review of Slash's Sig Les Paul in Guitarist mag Post by: GypsySoul on September 25, 2004, 01:48:14 PM GIBSON JUSTIN HAWKINS LES PAUL
(http://gypsysoul.lunarpages.com/guitarist904i.jpg) Fingerboard inlays are a subtle as the man himself The Bigsby may well be there as much for show as for practiicality (http://gypsysoul.lunarpages.com/guitarist904j.jpg) Title: Re: Review of Slash's Sig Les Paul in Guitarist mag Post by: N.I.B on September 25, 2004, 04:53:44 PM ooo, justin's les paul is NICE!
Title: Re: Review of Slash's Sig Les Paul in Guitarist mag Post by: AdZ on September 25, 2004, 05:50:16 PM If you like burning chunks of...
Title: Re: Review of Slash's Sig Les Paul in Guitarist mag Post by: N.I.B on September 25, 2004, 09:26:13 PM hey man i think it looks pretty sharp.
Title: Re: Review of Slash's Sig Les Paul in Guitarist mag Post by: Oddy on September 25, 2004, 10:59:47 PM thanks gypsy, you deserve a nobel prize or something
Title: Re: Review of Slash's Sig Les Paul in Guitarist mag Post by: N.I.B on September 26, 2004, 01:16:32 PM hey gypsy, u think u can post jimmy's guitar here?
Title: Re: Review of Slash's Sig Les Paul in Guitarist mag Post by: GypsySoul on September 26, 2004, 07:10:19 PM (http://gypsysoul.lunarpages.com/guitarist904k.jpg)
(http://gypsysoul.lunarpages.com/guitarist904l.jpg) (http://gypsysoul.lunarpages.com/guitarist904m.jpg) Title: Re: Review of Slash's Sig Les Paul in Guitarist mag Post by: GypsySoul on September 26, 2004, 07:17:31 PM (http://gypsysoul.lunarpages.com/guitarist904n.jpg)
(http://gypsysoul.lunarpages.com/guitarist904o.jpg)(http://gypsysoul.lunarpages.com/guitarist904p.jpg) (http://gypsysoul.lunarpages.com/guitarist904q.jpg) (http://gypsysoul.lunarpages.com/guitarist904r.jpg) The Page's push/pull pot works as a coil-split tone control for the bridge pickup The Page has it all: from classic old Standard tone through Clapton's 'woman tone' to Peter Green (http://gypsysoul.lunarpages.com/guitarist904s.jpg) Everything has been reproduced here - even the belt buckle damage Title: Re: Review of Slash's Sig Les Paul in Guitarist mag Post by: N.I.B on September 27, 2004, 05:37:43 PM hey i still like Hawkens' guitar. it looks sharp.
Title: Re: Review of Slash's Sig Les Paul in Guitarist mag Post by: coolman78SLASH on September 30, 2004, 05:48:37 AM Well, those are great guitars for sure. But if I had that much money (!!!!!) to buy only one of these guitars, I'd rather call the fucking custom shop for my own signature model! Damn, if there are actually people out there who are willing AND able to spend money on these guitars, then let me offer you a deal: you give me that money, because I can record an entire album, book and play a dozen shows with that money. After that, I'm gonna get you one of each signature model, handsigned by Slash and Jimmy themselves in return! With these guitars, you will instantly become a member of both Guns N' Roses AND Led Zeppelin! With these guitars, you will play guitar better than Slash and Jimmy together! With these guitars, you will have written both "Kashmir" and "Paradise City"! How's that? C'mon, just 5000,- to 6000,- pounds each, that's not asking too much - is it? Seriously, how much of a fan can one be? These "signature guitars" are just sick. At least the prices are. But I'm sure Slash can afford his one signature model. What's the market, what's the use for these models? Is it to show off the models they make for artists, or do they seriously aim at normal people to buy these guitars? I don't get it... On a sidenote: J. Hawkins from THE DARKNESS gets a SIGNATURE guitar? What's the world coming to?? LOL !! But if I had the money I would buy the Slash signature, because it have the abilety to switch over to an acustic (or was it spanish sounding?) guitar, and that would be cool to have on stage...By the way, Slash's one got the best overall review in this test diden't it? Title: Re: Review of Slash's Sig Les Paul in Guitarist mag Post by: Skeba on September 30, 2004, 08:44:49 AM You could just go to a shop and ask them to put one in your standard Les Paul.. It really isn't that big of an operation. It would still cost a whole lot less.
Title: Re: Review of Slash's Sig Les Paul in Guitarist mag Post by: coolman78SLASH on September 30, 2004, 10:34:05 AM Yeah, I guess you are right, but I said "if I had the money" and for a big Slash fan, and guitarist, it would be cool to own one, but I wont sell my car just to get it..
Title: Re: Review of Slash's Sig Les Paul in Guitarist mag Post by: N.I.B on October 01, 2004, 05:33:17 PM true enough. this is just for die-hard fans, such as myself :hihi:
|