Here Today... Gone To Hell!

SAN JOSE, Calif. - A New York woman is so angry at Apple Inc. for lopping $200 off the price of the iPhone that she's filed a lawsuit seeking US$1 million in damages.

THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
 
Dongmei Li of Queens, N.Y., claimed the company violated price discrimination laws when it slashed the price of the 8-gigabyte iPhone by a third, from US$599 to $399, within two months of the gadget's June debut.

Apple lowered the iPhone's price on Sept. 5 and also said it would stop selling the $499 4-gigabyte model. Hundreds of early customers who paid full price didn't expect a reduction so soon and complained.

Apple issued an apology the next day. Under its return policy, Apple refunded the $200 difference for those who bought the phone within 14 days of the reduction. And in a move to make peace with those who purchased the higher-priced phone before that period, the company offered a $100 credit at Apple stores.

According to Li's lawsuit, filed on Sept. 24 in the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York, the price reduction injured early purchasers like herself because they cannot resell the product for the same profit as those who bought the cell phone following the price cut.

Li purchased a 4GB iPhone for $499 and alleged that owners of the 4GB model were given less favorable terms than those who bought the 8GB model at the premium price, according to the lawsuit.

Apple spokeswoman Susan Lundgren declined to comment, citing the company's policy to not discuss pending litigation.

The lawsuit also named AT&T Inc., the exclusive carrier in the U.S. for the iPhone, and alleged the two companies' required two-year service contract for the iPhone constituted unfair business practices.

Mark Siegel, an AT&T spokesman, declined to comment, saying he had not yet seen the lawsuit.

---

In the season priemere of The Simpsons, the family goes to the mall and you hear a voice over the intercom saying "Attention shoppers, iPhone's now selling for a price of 10 cents"   :hihi:

man that is pretty lame to me!

One million dollars in "damages"?

Hahaha!

She should be glad she didn't buy a town home in Ft Myers, then she'd really be pissed.

First phase went for 300k, second phase sold for 145-170k.

It's called fair market value.

50 percent hair cut (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10WoQZKZkNs)

Obviously the company has to deal with it's image to the public, so it offers a refund for purchases within the past two weeks and $100 of credit for all other purchases.? I'd say that is fairly good damage control.? This woman was willing to pay the price before the reduction, so the iPhone must have been worth that price to her.? It was bad timing and now she's out a couple hundred dollars.? Boo-fucking-hoo!.... $1,000,000??

Is everyone in the United States just trying to squeeze as much cash as they can out of every situation?? ?:hihi:

If they instituted "loser pays" for shit like this, you would not see these ridiculous law suits in America.

For frivolous lawsuits like this, I agree, "loser pays" should apply.  The problem is what gets labeled as frivolous.  I wouldn't agree with loser pays in all cases because major corporations would become more immune to lawsuits by average citizens, who would be scared to death of bringing even legit claims because of the fear of getting saddled with a monstrous legal bill.  Some might say, don't sue unless you know you'll win, but the possibility of losing doesn't make a lawsuit frivolous.

It's been awhile since I took a Law course, but I know Canada has something like this in place to prevent everyone from suing left, right and center... I can't remember the specifics though.? Is there any attempts in the U.S. to change the process?

Lawyers have too much power in this country, so the answer would be "no."

what a douche.

damn... hmmm I cut my finger on the plastic outer case that the actual box sits in, while tring to get my IPod out..... maybe I should sue over that as well....

Do you live in the US?

 :hihi: :hihi:

Anyone can sue anyone for anything in america im sure.

untrue

The loser does pay over here in the UK

but it doesnt matter, the whole case is insured and damages come out of that - if you lose the insurance company pays up and you've only paid the insurance premium

Fear of lawsuits causes havoc over here.

There is a great book called "The case against lawyers" written by a lawyer, which goes into great detail of how to implement the 'loser pays' model into the American justice system and how it would put an end to these ridiculous lawsuits. I'd take her word on it over yours any day.

Edit: In America, we pay out insurance premiums, and then the insurance refuses to pay the bill. I can't think of a worse nightmare scenario, dealing with both attorneys and insurance companies.

That's the point. (Meaning that the "majority" is living in their own world)

America is like Japan, but sucky.

It is pretty shitty though when u buy something and then shortly after it goes on a huge sale.


Now 1 million is psychotic but the people should get the deal.

I bought an 8 gig Ipod nano for 250 bucks.

1 month later they release the 80 gig Ipod Classic for 250........ So yeah, If I had known and waited a month, I could've got 72 more gigs for the same price.

It's always like that though. That's why I never buy anything when it first comes out.

That's why you wait..

That's some pretty diehard advice.

Who needs an iPhone?

I just bought my first DVD player ever last week.

What does a monk need with a dvd player?   :D

To watch Kundun of course.

Now that is some patience ... as he approaches nirvana.

I thought I may achieve total enlightenment at 10,000 posts, but instead Jarmo sent me an ecard with his picture on it.