This is about one man and one man only. Axl fuckin' Rose.
I can understand how you could say that - I do believe that yeah, ultimately, like with the old band, since day one -? Axl will be held responsible for the outcome of the album/band's efforts,
BUT what have we heard from the band members -
including Axl?? That its not going to be 'The Axl Rose Album' because this is not 'The Axl Rose Band'
he (Axl) insists, ''It's not an Axl Rose album, even if it's what I wanted it to be. Everybody is putting everything they've got into singing and building. Maybe I'm helping steer it to what it should be built like.''
Axl Speaks Rolling Stone, January 2000Excuse my breaking into your conversation
To present the band matches up to his ideal... it might be one of the goals he set.
why would I mind? - seeing how you agree with me and all!
Presenting the band - presenting
Guns N' Roses, whose formation afterall is an accomplishment which must precede an album... or two... or three...
Keeping Guns N' Roses alive is what he has spent the better part of his life doing. I don't believe it is the creation of an album he's been after - he coulda done that a few times over in the past decade if he'd sought to do an 'Axl Rose Album'. But
no. It is the realization of Guns N' Roses that he wants.
Real-ization. Think about it. To make it exist as a reality... not only as a memory.