Here Today... Gone To Hell! | Message Board


Guns N Roses
of all the message boards on the internet, this is one...

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
June 16, 2024, 05:28:35 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
1228066 Posts in 43258 Topics by 9264 Members
Latest Member: EllaGNR
* Home Help Calendar Go to HTGTH Login Register
+  Here Today... Gone To Hell!
|-+  Guns N' Roses
| |-+  Guns N' Roses
| | |-+  Sanctuary's financial troubles
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]  All Go Down Print
Author Topic: Sanctuary's financial troubles  (Read 6585 times)
mrsaxlrose
Headliner
**

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 83


Here Today...


WWW
« Reply #20 on: June 20, 2005, 06:36:10 PM »

Sanctuary only owns the publishing rights to Axl's portion of GNR songs past and present.  Geffen/Interscope is GNR's record label, so I doubt Sanctuary being sold will force CD any sooner.
Logged

Yes, dammit, I WILL be Mrs. Axl Rose someday soon....
WAR41
VIP
****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1352

I must admit life is trite but that's all right


« Reply #21 on: June 20, 2005, 06:41:59 PM »


I sometimes wander whether Merck's special 'relationship' with Axl has clouded his judgement.




Top manegement don't get clouded by special relations, they would never get to be CO of a company if they did.
The record cd belongs to Geffen, Intercope or who ever owns them. Publishing rights on a new album is a long term investment, they will be better of with the old portofolio of GNR than an eventual new album.
the last 2/3 years have been pretty bad for the companies in the music industry and Sanctuary, that started to be just a manegment company spreed their interests, it's not a big deal a downsizing revenue (even a big one) if you compensate with other assets, investments in other markets, geograficaly and diversification of services. If The market value of the assets of santuary droped 40% in a year that would be very worring for them, i'm sure they would be taken over, and even that would only have repercussions on GNR if they let it.
Sanctuary till further notice is not their label.


February, normally you are right, but in this case you are wrong. 

I interviewed with Sanctuary Record Group for an internship and I brought up Mr. Mercuriadis.  The position I was offered was in the finance department, but I mentioned how I would love to work with Merck if the opportunity was there.  The two people interviewing me looked at each other started laughing and said simply "Merck (yes they called him Merck) is an interesting guy".  I smiled asked what they meant.  They explained to me that Merck is more on the 'creative' side of things and always sides with the artists.  He gets mad at us (the finance people) because all we see is the bottom line and we do not care about artistic integrity.  Since I was not offered a position in the NY office I declined the internship and took another one.

That is just my little interaction with people at Sanctuary and what I was told about Merck.
Logged
Gunna_girl01
Rocker
***

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 484


ROCK AND ROLL A WAY OF LIFE


« Reply #22 on: June 20, 2005, 10:51:11 PM »

MONEY SUCKS MAN...  nervous
Logged

LIVE IT LOVE IT CHERISH IT
FOR ROCK AND ROLL
IS MY LIFE
Kitano
Guest
« Reply #23 on: June 21, 2005, 04:28:28 PM »

It's worth noting that the 40% drop in profits is just for the first half of the year and seems to be mainly due to expansion costs which drag down the profitability of even the most successful company.  Remember that amazon.com didn't make a dime of profit for their first 8 years in operation.

This article is pure speculation but it take on more credability if the bottom line doesn't begin to improve.
Logged
Scabbie
Legend
*****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1893


Time is relative


« Reply #24 on: June 21, 2005, 04:51:44 PM »


I sometimes wander whether Merck's special 'relationship' with Axl has clouded his judgement.




Top manegement don't get clouded by special relations, they would never get to be CO of a company if they did.
The record cd belongs to Geffen, Intercope or who ever owns them. Publishing rights on a new album is a long term investment, they will be better of with the old portofolio of GNR than an eventual new album.
the last 2/3 years have been pretty bad for the companies in the music industry and Sanctuary, that started to be just a manegment company spreed their interests, it's not a big deal a downsizing revenue (even a big one) if you compensate with other assets, investments in other markets, geograficaly and diversification of services. If The market value of the assets of santuary droped 40% in a year that would be very worring for them, i'm sure they would be taken over, and even that would only have repercussions on GNR if they let it.
Sanctuary till further notice is not their label.


I care to disagree with you about 'Top Management'. Many of them have a great deal of affinity to products, people or projects and whilst their opinions aren't necessarily correct, they are very good at convincing others of their position. And it can be very difficult to admit defeat and cut your losses with projects if you have invested a lot of time and money.
Logged

Here today...ready to rock
ppbebe
Legend
*****

Karma: -1
Offline Offline

Posts: 10203


« Reply #25 on: June 21, 2005, 04:54:50 PM »

Agreed.  Kitano

A reminder:

1) Sanctuary group's got many labels and lots of artists other than GN'R as its clients to which Sir Elton john joined this April.   

2) They say that Sanctuary publishing was of Axl's choice. 

The notoriously unpredictable Axl Rose signed with Sanctuary after months of negotiations through his lawyers. Although rival publishers are believed to have offered more, Rose felt more comfortable with Sanctuary's business plan.

Quote
this board has a problem with believing the entire world revolves around guns n' roses.

Sorry. 2NaFish.....I'm not worshy. Cry
Logged
Lucio92
Headliner
**

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 77


GNR Venezuela


« Reply #26 on: June 25, 2005, 08:07:08 PM »

Heaven knows Sanctuary is miserable now
Louise Armitstead and Mark Kleinman
 
 
 
HAVING established a haven for rock artists, Sanctuary Music Group, one of Britain?s best-known and hitherto most successful music companies, will this week mount a fight to restore its financial health.
The company, whose clients include Elton John, Guns ?n? Roses and Beyonc?, is tomorrow holding a board meeting to discuss options, including an emergency rights issue and an acceleration of efforts to find an external investor or buyer.

 
 
The heat is on because the City believes Sanctuary is struggling to avoid breaching its banking covenants.

Conor O?Shea, media analyst at Teather & Greenwood, said last week: ?We estimate that unless conditions materially improve, the group risks breaching two of its main four banking covenants.?

Sanctuary?s founders, old university chums Andy Taylor and Rod Smallwood, are more used to being stock-market darlings than ugly ducklings.

The company, founded in 1976, took its sales to just ?13m by the end of 1998. Since then its turnover has soared, hitting ?220m in the year to the end of 2004.

But nine days ago its share price crashed following a profit warning, its second this year. Two weeks earlier the company had claimed it was in talks that could lead to a takeover offer, thought to be from either a competitor such as Warner Music Group or a private- equity firm.

After the profit warning on June 17, Sanctuary?s shares fell 30% from 43p to 29?p. On Friday they closed at 20?p amid fears that the group will struggle to restabilise its bruised balance sheet.

On Tuesday, when Sanctuary releases its interim results, the company is expected to say that discussions with potential suitors are ongoing but that no firm offer has been received.

Executive chairman Taylor will say the board has already identified areas in which it can slash millions of pounds from the company's cost base. A sale of the firm?s book-publishing division is one option under consideration.

But analysts and investors are sceptical. O?Shea said: ?I cannot see the business surviving in its current form. What is really surprising is that things have deteriorated at a time when the music industry is showing steady signs of improvement.?

Investor confidence in Sanctuary has been steadily waning for months. The company?s unique structure ? it is not just a traditional record label but also manages artists, acts as a promoter and handles merchandise sales ? has attracted clients but has also created a complex financial structure.

The company?s rapid growth has been fuelled by an aggressive acquisition policy in which Sanctuary has snapped up clients, including ?16m spent on Elton John?s management company in April. The series of purchases has been funded using ?30m of debt it tapped from Highbridge, a specialist house.

The head of equities at one of the City?s biggest institutions said: ?Sanctuary is simply not of investable quality.?

And the firm could face a fresh headache if negotiations with Morrissey, one of its biggest clients, lead to him leaving the group?s record label. Sanctuary declined to comment.
 
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2095-1669191,00.html
 
 
Logged
jameslofton29
What, me negative?
Legend
*****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 5446



WWW
« Reply #27 on: June 25, 2005, 08:34:24 PM »

I wonder if the name of the album has changed? Maybe Chinese Democracy was a working title? I remember one of Sanctuary's press releases mentioned a "forthcoming" GNR album. But no mention of the words Chinese Democracy. Kinda strange. Maybe I'm just reading between the lines too much. But I find it odd that they wouldn't mention CD.
Logged

SLCPUNK
Guest
« Reply #28 on: June 25, 2005, 08:56:19 PM »

Title is misleading.
Logged
Minneapolisnewsman
Guest
« Reply #29 on: June 29, 2005, 10:19:59 PM »

This is not good news.? BTW, their stock is in free fall, they are in debt 150 million, and are now discussing selling off assets to stay afloat.? Word inside the industry is that artists are getting a little worried and may flee, further complicating the situation.?Who knows if that (artists getting shifty regarding Sanctuary mgt) is true, but saw it mentioned during some discussions earlier today Moreover, there stock is depreciating at an alarming rate.  The bright side is they have enriched their catalog(albeit far too rapidly, part of the current financial problem) tremendously, and if they can trim some debt they have the potential to quickly experience ROI.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/story/0,3604,1516831,00.html

News like this stinks, and is only compounded by the negative impact on peoples lives, artists losing deals, people losing jobs, and records failing to have the marketing they deserve.? It's also very sad to see such a pro-artist organization like Sanctuary have problems.  To put it mildly, I would imagine many are on egg shells at the executive level.? If any bandmembers are still receiving checks from Sanctuary, I would imagine that is one of the first areas that the accountants will target to trim costs.? If it ain't creating profit immediately, or it's activities are not producing profit--cease the funding until it can and will create profit.?

In the above referenced article, it speaks about albums being delayed.  I would hope that they have some secured lines of credit, as financial problems could cripple future marketing of tours and artists.  I really don't know if Chinese Democracy will be marketed by Interscope or Sanctuary, but I would imagine the financial problems at Sanctuary do not bode well for a third or fourth quarter release. 

IMHO, Axl might of missed a great opportunity to release the album shortly after RIR III.  Moreover, with the air almost fully out of Velvet Revolvers proverbial tires (the new song Come on Come In could be the most pathetic song in years), Westerburg continuing to court Stinson, Axl further backed into a corner,  the rumors of 15-25 rockers in the vaults,  plus the 12 songs Duff, Izzy, and Slash wrote two years ago with Axl in mind I would expect that the chances for a reunion are increasing by the hour.
« Last Edit: June 29, 2005, 10:48:36 PM by Minneapolisnewsman » Logged
killingvector
Legend
*****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 3207


Bitches leave


« Reply #30 on: June 30, 2005, 01:27:16 AM »

I don't believe the catalog of new songs was in any shape for release after RIR 3. Personally, considering the long delays, I don't believe there were many songs in a final stage of completion in 2001. The same could be said for 2002 as well.......something about those vocals.......
Logged

I find that i'm far more powerful and effective when i can celebrate another's way, rather than to wish to own it.
Eva GnRAxlRosette
Legend
*****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 1593



WWW
« Reply #31 on: June 30, 2005, 09:06:01 PM »

Quote
A sale of the firm?s book-publishing division is one option under consideration.


That sounds like the way to go...  It would allow them to maintain their position as the "pro-artist organization" whilst trimming down a bit.  I didn't even know (or care!) that they had a book publishing division.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  All Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.043 seconds with 17 queries.