Stop posting articles for other GN'R fans to enjoy, it's stealing! (was Brain in Modern Drummer)

[radical tendency]

So is it the watermarks? or the posting of copyrighted material?

I personally think it was anything just to start a fight but that's just my opinion...

I have to agree. Gypsy Soul's original post was condescending, mocking, and clearly designed to elicit a response.

You clearly don't understand what I was talking about then.

Au contraire, I understand clearly point that you were trying to make in your opinion...

[TAP]

I just find it laughable Tap

Does the site u guys post on have this article up? yes or no?

Not any more, Gypsy Soul took it down.

[chineseblues]

So is it the watermarks? or the posting of copyrighted material?

I personally think it was anything just to start a fight but that's just my opinion...

I have to agree. Gypsy Soul's original post was condescending, mocking, and clearly designed to elicit a response.

You clearly don't understand what I was talking about then. The bullshit was started by the usual bunch of suspects, not Gypsy.

So you totally missed her/his/it's initial post then.

Please clarify for me "usual suspects."

As usual, the brown lipstick parade is always around to do their kissing.

Smoochie, smoochie.

Not I never missed Gypsy's original post, she ALWAYS gets shit from people when she posts articles. It's usually the same bunch of people (SLC and his gang of hangers on).


As for kissing anyone's ass, think what you want. I just think its bullshit for you bunch to bitch about this when Gypsy was only doing something good for the fans.

[Bandita]

So is it the watermarks? or the posting of copyrighted material?

I personally think it was anything just to start a fight but that's just my opinion...

I have to agree. Gypsy Soul's original post was condescending, mocking, and clearly designed to elicit a response.

You clearly don't understand what I was talking about then. The bullshit was started by the usual bunch of suspects, not Gypsy.

So you totally missed her/his/it's initial post then.

Please clarify for me "usual suspects."

As usual, the brown lipstick parade is always around to do their kissing.

Smoochie, smoochie.

Not I never missed Gypsy's original post, she ALWAYS gets shit from people when she posts articles.

She might want to take that personally then.  Just saying.

[D]

Yeah I am a brown noser.

Guess u haven't seen very many Slash threads lately or my hatred of Robin Finck post

I call things as I see them and the piling on of Jarmo for allowing a magazine article when your site and every other site is doing the same thing is just ridiculous.

When I don't agree with Jarmo, I am usually the first person to say so.



if Watermarking is lame so why did u watermark my pic?

typical hypocritical bullshit


bitch and get upset at one person, turn around and do the exact same.

thats cool though.

[D]

I just find it laughable Tap

Does the site u guys post on have this article up? yes or no?

Not any more, Gypsy Soul took it down.

so the site u guys post on doesn't have that interview and shit up?

[SLCPUNK]

Yes, everybody is just picking on poor old Gypsy Soul.

It couldn't have been because she said something stupid at the start of the thread right? She can say stupid shit like that, but when a poster responds they are "giving her shit."

OK, gotcha.

[radical tendency]

if Watermarking is lame so why did u watermark my pic?

typical hypocritical bullshit

Sir, you might want to read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irony

[SLCPUNK]

if Watermarking is lame so why did u watermark my pic?

Hello satire meet D, be sure to talk to him slowly.

[Bandita]

Yeah I am a brown noser.

Guess u haven't seen very many Slash threads lately or my hatred of Robin Finck post

I call things as I see them and the piling on of Jarmo for allowing a magazine article when your site and every other site is doing the same thing is just ridiculous.

When I don't agree with Jarmo, I am usually the first person to say so.



if Watermarking is lame so why did u watermark my pic?

typical hypocritical bullshit


bitch and get upset at one person, turn around and do the exact same.

thats cool though.

The thing about you is that you will go so far and then get all apologetic about it later on and then thank everyone who is looking for not getting banned.

Your opinion would mean a lot more if you didn't do that, it might actually look like you meant it.

But I digress, this thread is not about you.  You seem like a nice enough guy, though.

Watermarking of your pic and your reaction to it shows exactly how lame it is, see?  Granted, maybe not the most mature of responses but it's good to have a little fun at times, you get it?

[TAP]

I just find it laughable Tap

Does the site u guys post on have this article up? yes or no?

Not any more, Gypsy Soul took it down.

so the site u guys post on doesn't have that interview and shit up?

Why do people keep mentioning other sites? I thought this was administrative, feedback and help for HTGTH, not for every GNR site on the net.

[D]

I don't want u going to my Myspace or the gallery in here and pulling my pics from it, I don't want u watermarking any shit onto my pics.

I am not defending Gypsy, I am defending the people who were blasting Jarmo for the supposed Copyright hypocrisy via allowing magazines but not GNR stuff.


I just find it funny that people with tons of copyright infringements are blasting someone else for a copyright infringement. I think it is hilarious.

[Bandita]

Hilarity=laughter and as we all know, laughter is good for the soul.

[SLCPUNK]

I just find it funny that people with tons of copyright infringements are blasting someone else for a copyright infringement. I think it is hilarious.

You're not listening genius. All I said at the start was that the practice was LAME, which it is. Jarmo turned it into a copyright "you're much worse than me" argument to defend Gypsy. That's it. All anybody has to do is read the first post of this thread.

[D]

Yeah I am a brown noser.

Guess u haven't seen very many Slash threads lately or my hatred of Robin Finck post

I call things as I see them and the piling on of Jarmo for allowing a magazine article when your site and every other site is doing the same thing is just ridiculous.

When I don't agree with Jarmo, I am usually the first person to say so.



if Watermarking is lame so why did u watermark my pic?

typical hypocritical bullshit


bitch and get upset at one person, turn around and do the exact same.

thats cool though.

The thing about you is that you will go so far and then get all apologetic about it later on and then thank everyone who is looking for not getting banned.

Your opinion would mean a lot more if you didn't do that, it might actually look like you meant it.

But I digress, this thread is not about you.  You seem like a nice enough guy, though.

Watermarking of your pic and your reaction to it shows exactly how lame it is, see?  Granted, maybe not the most mature of responses but it's good to have a little fun at times, you get it?

nope, he did that way before I even got involved in this thread. I also don't apologize. i have my own opinions and just because I disagree with Jarmo on this and this, doesn't mean i dont like him or won't take up for him when i feel he is right.  as much as jim bob and i don't get a long, id still take up for him if I felt he was in the right and poeple were wrong.


Also, I've been banned from this site before while a certain someone sit back and let us take the fall while he kept his nose clean.

[SLCPUNK]

Hilarity=laughter and as we all know, laughter is good for the soul.

Just not Gypsy Soul.

[Lisa]

jesus D..it allcomes down to THE WATERMARKING..get it?

[SLCPUNK]

jesus D..it allcomes down to THE WATERMARKING..get it?

No, of course he doesn't "get it." Just like Jarmo doesn't "get it" because he's too busy lying his ass off.

[D]

The answer would be: No and more no. You should not have the marking all over it. It's like if you wrote an article and I watermarked it with my website all over it.

Or if you posted pictures of a concert and I then watermarked it with my website.

It's LAME, just like you.

Hey!

Go fuck yourself!

Yea, that's about the response I thought i'd get. Frankly it's about all you're worth.

So lets get this right... if somebody leaks Axl's work that's bad and you won't support that.

But on the other hand you can take a photographer's work and then stick your website's name all over it.
Gotcha.

I think this got the discussion away from the watermarks, glad I went back and read

[SLCPUNK]

glad I went back and read

First time for everything I guess.

Edit: All one has to do is read the first post, that's it.

Then Jarmo comes in with his lies and junior high accusations.