Here Today... Gone To Hell! | Message Board


Guns N Roses
of all the message boards on the internet, this is one...

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 31, 2024, 07:54:33 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
1227976 Posts in 43256 Topics by 9264 Members
Latest Member: EllaGNR
* Home Help Calendar Go to HTGTH Login Register
+  Here Today... Gone To Hell!
|-+  Off Topic
| |-+  Fun N' Games
| | |-+  The only World Cup 2006 thread you need
0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 22 23 [24] 25 26 ... 51 Go Down Print
Author Topic: The only World Cup 2006 thread you need  (Read 189646 times)
KIKO2K6
Happy as a Pig in Shit
VIP
****

Karma: -1
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1296


I am a ''ROCKER''


WWW
« Reply #460 on: June 20, 2006, 05:02:40 PM »

Great goal for England , amazing shot by Cole beatiful ... nice game . ?
Sweden was better than England on  the second half, They should have win .


Tomorow ?ARGENTINA X HOLANDA that wil be a nice game two..  ok

Next round ?ENGLAND X EQUADOR

 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?GERMANY X SWEDEN
Logged

The New Interpretation of a Masterwerk!!!!


http://www.angelfire.com/art2/kikoalbuquerque/


Chinese Democracy Starts....sometime between now and November 25th !
gnr-4-ever
VIP
****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1484

Personal Text:


WWW
« Reply #461 on: June 20, 2006, 05:09:51 PM »

GERMANY will beat SWEDEN, i'm so sure i could bet a house on it  yes peace
Logged

24/09/2010
17/07/2012
26/06/2015 🎩
19/05/2016 ⚡
04/07/2017
10/07/2017 🎤
03/06/2018
10/02/2019 🎩
19/07/2023
Grouse
I'm a prick too, so I deserve a title!
Legend
*****

Karma: -2
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1948



« Reply #462 on: June 20, 2006, 05:17:25 PM »

Great goal for England , amazing shot by Cole beatiful ... nice game . ?
Sweden was better than England on? the second half, They should have win .


Tomorow ?ARGENTINA X HOLANDA that wil be a nice game two.. ? ok

Next round ?ENGLAND X EQUADOR

 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?GERMANY X SWEDEN

hmm don't count on it The netherlands will be keeping alot of their best players on the bench, it will be a totally different team, I think that the same goes for argentina? Undecided
Logged
Layne Staley's Sunglasses
Satisfaction Guaranteed
Legend
*****

Karma: -1
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 8171


« Reply #463 on: June 20, 2006, 05:20:41 PM »

Hooray for Sweden and England advancing!
Logged
Filipe_Guns
Headliner
**

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 117


You have no idea.....


« Reply #464 on: June 20, 2006, 05:41:40 PM »

GERMANY will beat SWEDEN, i'm so sure i could bet a house on it? yes peace

agree. lucky England.....
If Englad keep playing like this they won't go anywhere, I'm expecting a hard match between Equador x England, both have a regular team....
Logged

"thanks to the lameass security, I'm going home"
Linuc
Headliner
**

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 139

www.gnrsweden.com


WWW
« Reply #465 on: June 20, 2006, 05:43:19 PM »

Germany have really much pressure.

I'm sure it will be a tuff match
Logged

Swedish Guns N' Roses-site & forum:
http://www.gnrsweden.com/
2NaFish
Harbinger of doom and gloom
Legend
*****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2620


Something Witty.


WWW
« Reply #466 on: June 20, 2006, 08:49:14 PM »

england smply arent good enough to win the world cup. first time they meet a good team they'll be heading home.
Logged
Jim
I was cured, all right.
Legend
*****

Karma: -2
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 7112


Singin' tu-lur-a-lei-oh...


« Reply #467 on: June 20, 2006, 09:15:00 PM »

yes it's sad we're just gona see 2 games a day from now on.
i will miss the group phase

Fuck no. I'd rather see two/one fucking quality game a day than three mediocre games.  yes

The knockout is when the tournament begins!!!!!
Logged

worst signature.

officially.

not chris misfit.
Tj
When you read this, I'm NOT downloading porn
Legend
*****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1782



« Reply #468 on: June 21, 2006, 04:15:07 AM »

england smply arent good enough to win the world cup. first time they meet a good team they'll be heading home.

You may be right, but England have a tendency to play as well as their opponents...whoever their opponents are Wink

Oh who am I kidding? They're doomed!
Logged
Six Strings
VIP
****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 675


Here Today...


« Reply #469 on: June 21, 2006, 04:22:06 AM »

England will reach the semi's. You'll see! peace

BTW... I won some money yesterday, I bet on draw.
Logged

"...It don't really matter..."
gnr-4-ever
VIP
****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1484

Personal Text:


WWW
« Reply #470 on: June 21, 2006, 04:31:53 AM »

GERMANY will beat SWEDEN, i'm so sure i could bet a house on it? yes peace

agree. lucky England.....
If Englad keep playing like this they won't go anywhere, I'm expecting a hard match between Equador x England, both have a regular team....

IMO they will play alot better when or if Owen returns and when Gerrard plays
Logged

24/09/2010
17/07/2012
26/06/2015 🎩
19/05/2016 ⚡
04/07/2017
10/07/2017 🎤
03/06/2018
10/02/2019 🎩
19/07/2023
Danny Top Hat
Guest
« Reply #471 on: June 21, 2006, 05:45:36 AM »

Well, Owen's out for the rest of the tournament so that doesn't bare well. Undecided


It definately looks like it was a bad idea to bring in Walcott and drop Defoe.? Only Sven would make such a reckless gamble with so much at stake.? We still do have a good chance of winning the competition but i'm not feeling all that confident at the moment.? I'd say Argentina, Brazil, Italy and Holland all have a much better chance right now, but maybe i'm wrong.? I do tend to be. ok

It'll be interesting to have another look at Portugal later on...
Logged
Judge Dredd
VIP
****

Karma: -1
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 657

Pretty Hate Machine


« Reply #472 on: June 21, 2006, 06:23:32 AM »

If Sven had the balls to pick Walcott, he should play Walcott.

Sven has no idea. He said when he picked the squad that Joe Cole could play the second striker role, despite never having played the position in his career. Then, 8 days later when a journalist asked him if he was considering using Joe Cole in the second striker role for one of the friendlies Sven said that Joe Cole has never played there and that he hadn't considered it.

Sven says Crouch and Gerrard won't play any part in the Sweden game. Well, we know what happened there. He clearly has no faith or confidence in Walcott or Carrick, so why didn't he go for the tried and trusted in the squad and pick Emile Heskey and Nicky Butt? Roll Eyes
Logged

http://www.gnrstrip.com/forum/

Give Peace A Chance...
Judge Dredd
VIP
****

Karma: -1
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 657

Pretty Hate Machine


« Reply #473 on: June 21, 2006, 06:55:17 AM »

According to Sky Sports News, Owen has a cruciate ligament injury and is out for 5 months.

Knowing how slowly Owen seems to recover in comparison to other players, I doubt we'll see him playing again before 2007.
Logged

http://www.gnrstrip.com/forum/

Give Peace A Chance...
Jim
I was cured, all right.
Legend
*****

Karma: -2
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 7112


Singin' tu-lur-a-lei-oh...


« Reply #474 on: June 21, 2006, 08:02:09 AM »

It definately looks like it was a bad idea to bring in Walcott and drop Defoe.

As far as I'm concerned, Walcott was a goood gamble, and it was Hargreaves who came instead of Defoe. We should have taken five strikers! Taking four, with one of them being Walcott, was always going to be a fucking joke.

Though, mayb Walcott really is that damn good that Sven doesn't want the world to see him before the group stage is over, doesn't want the later, much harder, opponents getting a look at him...

Clutching at straws, I know.  Undecided

If Owen hadn't have landed on his leg like an idiot, and the Crouch substitution wasn't forced, I wonder if Lennon would have come on again.

Sven says Crouch and Gerrard won't play any part in the Sweden game. Well, we know what happened there.

Oh come on. Sven didn't have a choice about bringing on Crouch, Owen would certainly have played 90 minutes otherwise, and the Gerrard substitution was a good one. I don't give a shit if Sven changes whatever tactics he tells the media, so long as they work. And they almost did........

But not playing Carrick was a crime.
« Last Edit: June 21, 2006, 08:04:17 AM by Jim » Logged

worst signature.

officially.

not chris misfit.
2NaFish
Harbinger of doom and gloom
Legend
*****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2620


Something Witty.


WWW
« Reply #475 on: June 21, 2006, 08:53:46 AM »

whilst i do think walcott is a cracking player, if he was THAT good (like you say/hope/pray/clutch at) then wenger would've played him at some point in the season or thrown him on with ten minutes to go in paris.

he'll be forced to play him now that and i think he'll surprise a few of the doubters as i really rate walcott.
Logged
Danny Top Hat
Guest
« Reply #476 on: June 21, 2006, 09:02:50 AM »

I hope so dude, but it's a phenominal amount of pressure to put on a kid who's never played in the Premiership.  Even if he is *THAT* good he'll need to have balls of steel if he's gonna raise his game against the big teams.
Logged
Izzy
Whine, moan, complain... Repeat
Legend
*****

Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 8688


More than meets the eye


« Reply #477 on: June 21, 2006, 09:16:19 AM »

Gutted for Owen - just gutted

5 months out- and then the rest,  means he'll have played one Premiership game by the time 2006 closes - and he's now 26, he cant heal like he did

Damn shame - cos he's twice the goal scorer Rooney is

All the best Owen - and i'd really hoped he'd return to Liverpool soon


....as for Walcott.... rofl

Of course he's that good confused
Logged

Quick! To the bandwagon!
Judge Dredd
VIP
****

Karma: -1
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 657

Pretty Hate Machine


« Reply #478 on: June 21, 2006, 09:24:08 AM »

whilst i do think walcott is a cracking player, if he was THAT good (like you say/hope/pray/clutch at) then wenger would've played him at some point in the season or thrown him on with ten minutes to go in paris.

he'll be forced to play him now that and i think he'll surprise a few of the doubters as i really rate walcott.

Wenger couldn't use him in Paris because he let Sven take him to Portugal with the rest of the squad for training in how not to deal with set pieces and give the ball away.

I've seen Walcott in the flesh for the Arsenal reserves twice. Whilst it may only be the reserves, the boy is quite clearly cut from a different cloth. Or for those from north of Watford, he's different gravy. rofl

I remember seeing Fabregas for the first time, and I got a similar feeling when I saw Walcott. He's a little bit special. yes

Personaly the mistake in the squad for me is Jenas. I'd have dumped him and brought in Bent, Defoe or Ashton.
Logged

http://www.gnrstrip.com/forum/

Give Peace A Chance...
Jim
I was cured, all right.
Legend
*****

Karma: -2
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 7112


Singin' tu-lur-a-lei-oh...


« Reply #479 on: June 21, 2006, 09:26:31 AM »

Damn shame - cos he's twice the goal scorer Rooney is

Well.... Yes, but only because he's part of the Van Nistelroy school of attack. He's a predator. There is nothing wrong with that, but the reason that Rooney is one of the best players in the world right now isn't because he's scoring goals.
Logged

worst signature.

officially.

not chris misfit.
Pages: 1 ... 22 23 [24] 25 26 ... 51 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.04 seconds with 18 queries.